Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

ActiveCampaign vs Zapier

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

ActiveCampaign and Zapier both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zapier (rank #27) holds a meaningful lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (64 vs 38). The gap of 26 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zapier is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zapier is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zapier is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zapier is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zapier is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Zapier shows 6,774 stars across 296 public repos, 13 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Zapier looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricActiveCampaignZapier
Ranking
Overall rank#485#27
Pillars
Overall3864
Code5568
Education6673
Community3437
Reach3063
Momentum1254
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,6536,774
Forks1,8791,358
Public repos88296
Active repos (90d)613
External contributors322
Avg polish5579
Avg AI-readiness3243

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View ActiveCampaign developer profileView Zapier developer profile