Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

ActiveCampaign vs Zendesk

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

ActiveCampaign and Zendesk both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zendesk (rank #165) holds a modest lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 38). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zendesk is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ActiveCampaign is ahead of Zendesk. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zendesk is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zendesk is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zendesk is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.

ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Zendesk shows 12,427 stars across 891 public repos, 87 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors.

ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Zendesk looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricActiveCampaignZendesk
Ranking
Overall rank#485#165
Pillars
Overall3851
Code5557
Education6652
Community3445
Reach3038
Momentum1254
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,65312,427
Forks1,8793,361
Public repos88891
Active repos (90d)687
External contributors310
Avg polish5554
Avg AI-readiness3240

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View ActiveCampaign developer profileView Zendesk developer profile