ActiveCampaign vs Zoom
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ActiveCampaign and Zoom (Power Up Your Apps with Video, Phone, and Chat) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zoom (rank #122) holds a modest lead over ActiveCampaign (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 38). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ActiveCampaign is slightly ahead of Zoom. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zoom is ahead of ActiveCampaign. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zoom is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zoom is slightly ahead of ActiveCampaign. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zoom is clearly ahead of ActiveCampaign.
ActiveCampaign carries 6,653 GitHub stars across 88 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Zoom shows 3,380 stars across 159 public repos, 62 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors.
ActiveCampaign is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Zoom looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ActiveCampaign | Zoom |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #122 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 54 |
| Code | 55 | 52 |
| Education | 66 | 78 |
| Community | 34 | 35 |
| Reach | 30 | 38 |
| Momentum | 12 | 77 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,653 | 3,380 |
| Forks | 1,879 | 1,526 |
| Public repos | 88 | 159 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 62 |
| External contributors | 3 | 4 |
| Avg polish | 55 | 63 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 30 |