Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

adobe-commerce vs Qonto

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

adobe-commerce and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Qonto (rank #338) holds a modest lead over adobe-commerce (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 32). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is slightly ahead of adobe-commerce. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is clearly ahead of adobe-commerce. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), adobe-commerce is slightly ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), adobe-commerce is ahead of Qonto.

adobe-commerce carries 39 GitHub stars across 21 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Qonto's footprint is roughly 12.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

adobe-commerce is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Qonto looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

Metricadobe-commerceQonto
Ranking
Overall rank#662#338
Pillars
Overall3243
Code5157
Education4475
Community2825
Reach4024
Momentum2121
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars39501
Forks31158
Public repos2175
Active repos (90d)911
External contributors45
Avg polish4762
Avg AI-readiness4736

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View adobe-commerce developer profileView Qonto developer profile