Open source from Adobe
Adobe, Inc. vs Zulip
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Adobe, Inc. (Open source from Adobe) and Zulip (Organized team chat) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Adobe, Inc. (rank #47) holds a meaningful lead over Zulip (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (61 vs 36). The gap of 25 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Adobe, Inc. is ahead of Zulip. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Adobe, Inc. is ahead of Zulip. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Adobe, Inc. is slightly ahead of Zulip. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Adobe, Inc. is ahead of Zulip. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Adobe, Inc. is clearly ahead of Zulip.
Adobe, Inc. carries 63,154 GitHub stars across 1,108 public repos, with 91 repositories active in the last 90 days and 87 external contributors on record. Zulip shows 32,299 stars across 67 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 76 external contributors.
Adobe, Inc. is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Zulip makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Adobe, Inc. | Zulip |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #47 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 61 | 36 |
| Code | 84 | 64 |
| Education | 62 | 49 |
| Community | 53 | 47 |
| Reach | 34 | 25 |
| Momentum | 66 | 38 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 63,154 | 32,299 |
| Forks | 13,529 | 14,237 |
| Public repos | 1,108 | 67 |
| Active repos (90d) | 91 | 9 |
| External contributors | 87 | 76 |
| Avg polish | 95 | 67 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 46 | 38 |