Official examples for Adyen products and services
Adyen Examples vs Chargebee
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Adyen Examples (Official examples for Adyen products and services) and Chargebee (Billing Platform for Subscription Businesses.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Adyen Examples and Chargebee sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (41), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Adyen Examples is ahead of Chargebee. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Adyen Examples is clearly ahead of Chargebee. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Adyen Examples is ahead of Chargebee. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Chargebee is ahead of Adyen Examples. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Chargebee is clearly ahead of Adyen Examples.
Adyen Examples carries 669 GitHub stars across 34 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Chargebee shows 651 stars across 45 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.
Adyen Examples is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Chargebee looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Adyen Examples | Chargebee |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 41 |
| Code | 71 | 52 |
| Education | 79 | 52 |
| Community | 43 | 25 |
| Reach | 0 | 16 |
| Momentum | 27 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 669 | 651 |
| Forks | 586 | 582 |
| Public repos | 34 | 45 |
| Active repos (90d) | 14 | 20 |
| External contributors | 2 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 79 | 55 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 32 |