Official examples for Adyen products and services
Adyen Examples vs Datto, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Adyen Examples (Official examples for Adyen products and services) and Datto, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Adyen Examples (rank #401) holds a modest lead over Datto, Inc. (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 32). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Adyen Examples is clearly ahead of Datto, Inc.. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Adyen Examples is slightly ahead of Datto, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Adyen Examples is clearly ahead of Datto, Inc.. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Datto, Inc. is slightly ahead of Adyen Examples. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Adyen Examples is ahead of Datto, Inc..
Adyen Examples carries 669 GitHub stars across 34 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Datto, Inc. shows 1,115 stars across 63 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Adyen Examples is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Datto, Inc. looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Adyen Examples | Datto, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #662 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 32 |
| Code | 71 | 38 |
| Education | 79 | 77 |
| Community | 43 | 19 |
| Reach | 0 | 6 |
| Momentum | 27 | 14 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 669 | 1,115 |
| Forks | 586 | 315 |
| Public repos | 34 | 63 |
| Active repos (90d) | 14 | 1 |
| External contributors | 2 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 79 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 19 |