Official examples for Adyen products and services
Adyen Examples vs Pendo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Adyen Examples (Official examples for Adyen products and services) and Pendo both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Adyen Examples (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Pendo (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 33). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Adyen Examples is clearly ahead of Pendo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Adyen Examples is ahead of Pendo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Pendo is slightly ahead of Adyen Examples. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Pendo is clearly ahead of Adyen Examples. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Pendo is slightly ahead of Adyen Examples.
Adyen Examples carries 669 GitHub stars across 34 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Pendo shows 267 stars across 134 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
Adyen Examples is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Pendo looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Adyen Examples | Pendo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 33 |
| Code | 71 | 27 |
| Education | 79 | 61 |
| Community | 43 | 47 |
| Reach | 0 | 23 |
| Momentum | 27 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 669 | 267 |
| Forks | 586 | 88 |
| Public repos | 34 | 134 |
| Active repos (90d) | 14 | 18 |
| External contributors | 2 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 79 | 34 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 18 |