Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Adyen vs Ahrefs

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Adyen and Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Adyen (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Ahrefs (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 41). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Adyen is clearly ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Ahrefs is ahead of Adyen. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Adyen is ahead of Ahrefs. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Ahrefs is ahead of Adyen. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is ahead of Adyen.

Adyen carries 2,684 GitHub stars across 65 public repos, with 49 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. Ahrefs shows 1,303 stars across 171 public repos, 28 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors.

Adyen is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Ahrefs looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricAdyenAhrefs
Ranking
Overall rank#165#401
Pillars
Overall5141
Code8042
Education4757
Community4637
Reach721
Momentum4765
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars2,6841,303
Forks1,978261
Public repos65171
Active repos (90d)4928
External contributors397
Avg polish8940
Avg AI-readiness4435

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Adyen developer profileView Ahrefs developer profile