Adyen vs apaleo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Adyen and apaleo both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Adyen (rank #165) holds a modest lead over apaleo (rank #455) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 39). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Adyen is clearly ahead of apaleo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), apaleo is clearly ahead of Adyen. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Adyen is clearly ahead of apaleo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), apaleo is ahead of Adyen. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Adyen is clearly ahead of apaleo.
Adyen carries 2,684 GitHub stars across 65 public repos, with 49 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. apaleo shows 8 stars across 5 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Adyen's footprint is roughly 335.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Adyen is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. apaleo looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Adyen | apaleo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #455 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 39 |
| Code | 80 | 40 |
| Education | 47 | 85 |
| Community | 46 | 11 |
| Reach | 7 | 23 |
| Momentum | 47 | 24 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2,684 | 8 |
| Forks | 1,978 | 4 |
| Public repos | 65 | 5 |
| Active repos (90d) | 49 | 2 |
| External contributors | 39 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 89 | 39 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 44 | 32 |