Adyen vs celigo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Adyen and celigo both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Adyen (rank #165) holds a modest lead over celigo (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 36). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Adyen is clearly ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), celigo is ahead of Adyen. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Adyen is ahead of celigo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is clearly ahead of Adyen. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Adyen is clearly ahead of celigo.
Adyen carries 2,684 GitHub stars across 65 public repos, with 49 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. celigo shows 43 stars across 26 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Adyen's footprint is roughly 62.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Adyen is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. celigo looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Adyen | celigo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 36 |
| Code | 80 | 39 |
| Education | 47 | 57 |
| Community | 46 | 29 |
| Reach | 7 | 52 |
| Momentum | 47 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2,684 | 43 |
| Forks | 1,978 | 131 |
| Public repos | 65 | 26 |
| Active repos (90d) | 49 | 6 |
| External contributors | 39 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 89 | 34 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 44 | 30 |