Adyen vs Cloudbeds

Adyen and Cloudbeds both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Adyen (rank #162) holds a meaningful lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 30). The gap of 21 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Adyen is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cloudbeds is clearly ahead of Adyen. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Adyen is ahead of Cloudbeds. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Adyen is slightly ahead of Cloudbeds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Adyen is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds.

Adyen carries 2,687 GitHub stars across 65 public repos, with 48 repositories active in the last 90 days and 38 external contributors on record. Cloudbeds shows 49 stars across 29 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Adyen's footprint is roughly 54.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Adyen is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Cloudbeds looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.