Countly is a privacy-first, AI-powered analytics and engagement platform for understanding and optimizing customer journeys across digital applications
Adyen vs Countly Team
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Adyen and Countly Team (Countly is a privacy-first, AI-powered analytics and engagement platform for understanding and optimizing customer journeys across digital applications) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Adyen (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Countly Team (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 38). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Adyen is clearly ahead of Countly Team. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Countly Team is ahead of Adyen. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Countly Team is ahead of Adyen. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Countly Team is ahead of Adyen.
Adyen carries 2,684 GitHub stars across 65 public repos, with 49 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. Countly Team shows 7,804 stars across 48 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors.
Adyen is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Countly Team looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Adyen | Countly Team |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 38 |
| Code | 80 | 57 |
| Education | 47 | 56 |
| Community | 46 | 46 |
| Reach | 7 | 17 |
| Momentum | 47 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2,684 | 7,804 |
| Forks | 1,978 | 2,002 |
| Public repos | 65 | 48 |
| Active repos (90d) | 49 | 20 |
| External contributors | 39 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 89 | 61 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 44 | 37 |