Adyen vs Jamf

Adyen and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Adyen (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 40). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Adyen is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is clearly ahead of Adyen. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Adyen is slightly ahead of Jamf. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is clearly ahead of Adyen. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is ahead of Adyen.

Adyen carries 2,684 GitHub stars across 65 public repos, with 49 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Adyen is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Jamf looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.