Adyen vs Metabase

Adyen and Metabase both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Adyen and Metabase sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (51), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Adyen is clearly ahead of Metabase. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is clearly ahead of Adyen. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Adyen is slightly ahead of Metabase. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Metabase is clearly ahead of Adyen. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Metabase is ahead of Adyen.

Adyen carries 2,684 GitHub stars across 65 public repos, with 49 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. Metabase shows 50,225 stars across 100 public repos, 21 active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Metabase's footprint is roughly 18.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Adyen is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Metabase looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.