Adyen vs RingCentral, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Adyen and RingCentral, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Adyen (rank #165) holds a modest lead over RingCentral, Inc. (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 42). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Adyen is clearly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of Adyen. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Adyen is slightly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), RingCentral, Inc. is ahead of Adyen. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Adyen is slightly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. .
Adyen carries 2,684 GitHub stars across 65 public repos, with 49 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. RingCentral, Inc. shows 1,659 stars across 184 public repos, 31 active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors.
Adyen is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. RingCentral, Inc. looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Adyen | RingCentral, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 42 |
| Code | 80 | 59 |
| Education | 47 | 52 |
| Community | 46 | 42 |
| Reach | 7 | 23 |
| Momentum | 47 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2,684 | 1,659 |
| Forks | 1,978 | 23,722 |
| Public repos | 65 | 184 |
| Active repos (90d) | 49 | 31 |
| External contributors | 39 | 17 |
| Avg polish | 89 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 44 | 48 |