Affinity vs celigo

Affinity and celigo both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Affinity and celigo sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (36), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Affinity is slightly ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), celigo is ahead of Affinity. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), celigo is ahead of Affinity. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Affinity is ahead of celigo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), celigo is ahead of Affinity.

Affinity carries 4 GitHub stars across 40 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. celigo shows 43 stars across 26 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but celigo's footprint is roughly 10.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Affinity is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. celigo looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.