Affinity vs Cloudbeds

Affinity and Cloudbeds both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Affinity (rank #537) holds a narrow lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 30). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Cloudbeds is slightly ahead of Affinity. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cloudbeds is clearly ahead of Affinity. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Cloudbeds is ahead of Affinity. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Affinity is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Cloudbeds is ahead of Affinity.

Affinity carries 4 GitHub stars across 40 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Cloudbeds shows 49 stars across 29 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Cloudbeds's footprint is roughly 12.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Affinity is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Cloudbeds looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.