Affinity vs Doctolib

Affinity and Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Affinity (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 33). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is ahead of Affinity. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is clearly ahead of Affinity. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doctolib is ahead of Affinity. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Affinity is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doctolib is ahead of Affinity.

Affinity carries 4 GitHub stars across 40 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Doctolib shows 776 stars across 57 public repos, 10 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Doctolib's footprint is roughly 194.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Affinity is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Doctolib looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.