Afterpay vs celigo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Afterpay and celigo both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
celigo (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Afterpay (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 30). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Afterpay is slightly ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), celigo is ahead of Afterpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), celigo is slightly ahead of Afterpay. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is slightly ahead of Afterpay. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Afterpay is slightly ahead of celigo.
Afterpay carries 99 GitHub stars across 12 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors on record. celigo shows 43 stars across 26 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Afterpay is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. celigo looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Afterpay | celigo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 36 |
| Code | 44 | 39 |
| Education | 38 | 57 |
| Community | 26 | 29 |
| Reach | 47 | 52 |
| Momentum | 13 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 99 | 43 |
| Forks | 135 | 131 |
| Public repos | 12 | 26 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 6 |
| External contributors | 4 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 34 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 30 |