Afterpay vs Doist
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Afterpay and Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doist (rank #122) holds a meaningful lead over Afterpay (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 30). The gap of 24 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is ahead of Afterpay. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is clearly ahead of Afterpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doist is ahead of Afterpay. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Afterpay is slightly ahead of Doist. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is clearly ahead of Afterpay.
Afterpay carries 99 GitHub stars across 12 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors on record. Doist shows 5,576 stars across 170 public repos, 45 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Doist's footprint is roughly 56.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Afterpay is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Doist looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Afterpay | Doist |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #122 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 54 |
| Code | 44 | 59 |
| Education | 38 | 85 |
| Community | 26 | 36 |
| Reach | 47 | 40 |
| Momentum | 13 | 46 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 99 | 5,576 |
| Forks | 135 | 563 |
| Public repos | 12 | 170 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 45 |
| External contributors | 4 | 21 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 58 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 47 |