Afterpay vs Getty Images
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Afterpay and Getty Images both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Getty Images (rank #692) holds a narrow lead over Afterpay (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (31 vs 30). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Getty Images is slightly ahead of Afterpay. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Getty Images is clearly ahead of Afterpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Afterpay is slightly ahead of Getty Images. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Afterpay is ahead of Getty Images. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Getty Images is slightly ahead of Afterpay.
Afterpay carries 99 GitHub stars across 12 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors on record. Getty Images shows 951 stars across 32 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Getty Images's footprint is roughly 9.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Afterpay is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Getty Images looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Afterpay | Getty Images |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #692 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 31 |
| Code | 44 | 46 |
| Education | 38 | 61 |
| Community | 26 | 20 |
| Reach | 47 | 28 |
| Momentum | 13 | 15 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 99 | 951 |
| Forks | 135 | 497 |
| Public repos | 12 | 32 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 5 |
| External contributors | 4 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 22 |