Afterpay vs Razorpay
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Afterpay and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Razorpay (rank #31) holds a meaningful lead over Afterpay (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 30). The gap of 33 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Afterpay. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Razorpay is ahead of Afterpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is ahead of Afterpay. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is ahead of Afterpay. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Afterpay.
Afterpay carries 99 GitHub stars across 12 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,812 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 33 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Razorpay's footprint is roughly 38.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Afterpay is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Razorpay looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Afterpay | Razorpay |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #31 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 63 |
| Code | 44 | 68 |
| Education | 38 | 53 |
| Community | 26 | 44 |
| Reach | 47 | 58 |
| Momentum | 13 | 71 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 99 | 3,812 |
| Forks | 135 | 1,929 |
| Public repos | 12 | 177 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 38 |
| External contributors | 4 | 33 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 69 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 49 |