Afterpay vs Sage
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Afterpay and Sage both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Sage (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over Afterpay (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 30). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Sage is ahead of Afterpay. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Sage is ahead of Afterpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Sage is slightly ahead of Afterpay. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Afterpay is clearly ahead of Sage. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Afterpay is slightly ahead of Sage.
Afterpay carries 99 GitHub stars across 12 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors on record. Sage shows 2,180 stars across 122 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Sage's footprint is roughly 22.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Afterpay is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Sage looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Afterpay | Sage |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 33 |
| Code | 44 | 56 |
| Education | 38 | 52 |
| Community | 26 | 34 |
| Reach | 47 | 23 |
| Momentum | 13 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 99 | 2,180 |
| Forks | 135 | 430 |
| Public repos | 12 | 122 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 6 |
| External contributors | 4 | 22 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 38 |