Afterpay vs Typeform
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Afterpay and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Typeform (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Afterpay (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 30). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is clearly ahead of Afterpay. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Typeform is ahead of Afterpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Afterpay is slightly ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Afterpay is slightly ahead of Typeform. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Typeform is ahead of Afterpay.
Afterpay carries 99 GitHub stars across 12 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Typeform's footprint is roughly 6.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Afterpay is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Typeform looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Afterpay | Typeform |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #189 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 50 |
| Code | 44 | 71 |
| Education | 38 | 51 |
| Community | 26 | 25 |
| Reach | 47 | 43 |
| Momentum | 13 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 99 | 590 |
| Forks | 135 | 254 |
| Public repos | 12 | 40 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 8 |
| External contributors | 4 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 75 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 38 |