AfterShip vs Cloudbeds

AfterShip (We are passionate about making eCommerce better. We are a group of geeks who build great automation tools for retailers and shoppers.) and Cloudbeds both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

AfterShip (rank #300) holds a modest lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 30). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), AfterShip is slightly ahead of Cloudbeds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cloudbeds is ahead of AfterShip. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), AfterShip is ahead of Cloudbeds. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), AfterShip is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), AfterShip is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds.

AfterShip carries 3,399 GitHub stars across 81 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors on record. Cloudbeds shows 49 stars across 29 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but AfterShip's footprint is roughly 69.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

AfterShip is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Cloudbeds looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.