AfterShip vs Fillout

AfterShip (We are passionate about making eCommerce better. We are a group of geeks who build great automation tools for retailers and shoppers.) and Fillout both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

AfterShip (rank #298) holds a narrow lead over Fillout (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 37). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), AfterShip is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), AfterShip is slightly ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), AfterShip is ahead of Fillout. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is clearly ahead of AfterShip. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), AfterShip is clearly ahead of Fillout.

AfterShip carries 3,397 GitHub stars across 81 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Fillout shows 2 stars across 9 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but AfterShip's footprint is roughly 1698.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

AfterShip is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Fillout looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.