We are passionate about making eCommerce better. We are a group of geeks who build great automation tools for retailers and shoppers.
AfterShip vs Jamf
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
AfterShip (We are passionate about making eCommerce better. We are a group of geeks who build great automation tools for retailers and shoppers.) and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
AfterShip (rank #298) holds a narrow lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 40). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), AfterShip is ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is ahead of AfterShip. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), AfterShip is slightly ahead of Jamf. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is ahead of AfterShip. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of AfterShip.
AfterShip carries 3,397 GitHub stars across 81 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
AfterShip is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Jamf looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AfterShip | Jamf |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #298 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 45 | 40 |
| Code | 50 | 33 |
| Education | 59 | 68 |
| Community | 46 | 41 |
| Reach | 27 | 44 |
| Momentum | 40 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,397 | 7,946 |
| Forks | 1,003 | 1,547 |
| Public repos | 81 | 114 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 20 |
| External contributors | 5 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 52 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 21 |