We are passionate about making eCommerce better. We are a group of geeks who build great automation tools for retailers and shoppers.
AfterShip vs Zammad
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
AfterShip (We are passionate about making eCommerce better. We are a group of geeks who build great automation tools for retailers and shoppers.) and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zammad (rank #152) holds a narrow lead over AfterShip (rank #298) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 45). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is ahead of AfterShip. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zammad is ahead of AfterShip. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of AfterShip. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), AfterShip is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), AfterShip is slightly ahead of Zammad.
AfterShip carries 3,397 GitHub stars across 81 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors.
AfterShip is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AfterShip | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #298 | #152 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 45 | 52 |
| Code | 50 | 63 |
| Education | 59 | 71 |
| Community | 46 | 70 |
| Reach | 27 | 0 |
| Momentum | 40 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,397 | 6,394 |
| Forks | 1,003 | 1,687 |
| Public repos | 81 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 9 |
| External contributors | 5 | 27 |
| Avg polish | 52 | 71 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 35 |