Agorapulse vs apaleo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Agorapulse and apaleo both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
apaleo (rank #455) holds a narrow lead over Agorapulse (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (39 vs 32). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), apaleo is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Agorapulse is ahead of apaleo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Agorapulse is clearly ahead of apaleo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Agorapulse is slightly ahead of apaleo.
Agorapulse carries 308 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. apaleo shows 8 stars across 5 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Agorapulse's footprint is roughly 38.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Agorapulse is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. apaleo looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Agorapulse | apaleo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #455 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 39 |
| Code | 40 | 40 |
| Education | 25 | 85 |
| Community | 25 | 11 |
| Reach | 44 | 23 |
| Momentum | 30 | 24 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 308 | 8 |
| Forks | 154 | 4 |
| Public repos | 80 | 5 |
| Active repos (90d) | 16 | 2 |
| External contributors | 2 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 38 | 39 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 32 |