Agorapulse vs Chargebee
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Agorapulse and Chargebee (Billing Platform for Subscription Businesses.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Chargebee (rank #401) holds a modest lead over Agorapulse (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 32). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Chargebee is ahead of Agorapulse. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Chargebee is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Agorapulse is clearly ahead of Chargebee. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Chargebee is clearly ahead of Agorapulse.
Agorapulse carries 308 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Chargebee shows 651 stars across 45 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.
Agorapulse is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Chargebee looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Agorapulse | Chargebee |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 41 |
| Code | 40 | 52 |
| Education | 25 | 52 |
| Community | 25 | 25 |
| Reach | 44 | 16 |
| Momentum | 30 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 308 | 651 |
| Forks | 154 | 582 |
| Public repos | 80 | 45 |
| Active repos (90d) | 16 | 20 |
| External contributors | 2 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 38 | 55 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 32 |