A collection of libraries and plugins for Checkout.com
Agorapulse vs Checkout.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Agorapulse and Checkout.com (A collection of libraries and plugins for Checkout.com) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Checkout.com (rank #152) holds a modest lead over Agorapulse (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 32). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Checkout.com is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Checkout.com is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Checkout.com is slightly ahead of Agorapulse. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Checkout.com is ahead of Agorapulse. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Checkout.com is clearly ahead of Agorapulse.
Agorapulse carries 308 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Checkout.com shows 542 stars across 55 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors.
Agorapulse is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Checkout.com looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Agorapulse | Checkout.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #152 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 52 |
| Code | 40 | 62 |
| Education | 25 | 54 |
| Community | 25 | 33 |
| Reach | 44 | 59 |
| Momentum | 30 | 64 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 308 | 542 |
| Forks | 154 | 505 |
| Public repos | 80 | 55 |
| Active repos (90d) | 16 | 26 |
| External contributors | 2 | 11 |
| Avg polish | 38 | 60 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 46 |