Agorapulse vs CrowdStrike

Agorapulse and CrowdStrike both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

CrowdStrike (rank #55) holds a meaningful lead over Agorapulse (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (60 vs 32). The gap of 28 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), CrowdStrike is ahead of Agorapulse. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), CrowdStrike is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), CrowdStrike is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Agorapulse is slightly ahead of CrowdStrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), CrowdStrike is clearly ahead of Agorapulse.

Agorapulse carries 308 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. CrowdStrike shows 5,991 stars across 267 public repos, 74 active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but CrowdStrike's footprint is roughly 19.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Agorapulse is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. CrowdStrike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.