Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.
Agorapulse vs Doctolib
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Agorapulse and Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Agorapulse and Doctolib sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (33), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is ahead of Agorapulse. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Agorapulse. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Agorapulse is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Agorapulse is ahead of Doctolib.
Agorapulse carries 307 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Doctolib shows 776 stars across 57 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Agorapulse is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Doctolib looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Agorapulse | Doctolib |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 33 |
| Code | 40 | 51 |
| Education | 25 | 72 |
| Community | 25 | 28 |
| Reach | 44 | 10 |
| Momentum | 31 | 18 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 307 | 776 |
| Forks | 154 | 81 |
| Public repos | 80 | 57 |
| Active repos (90d) | 17 | 9 |
| External contributors | 2 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 38 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 31 |