Agorapulse vs Grammarly

Agorapulse and Grammarly (Millions of users rely on Grammarly's AI-powered products to make their messages, documents, and social media posts clear, mistake-free, and impactful.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Grammarly (rank #600) holds a narrow lead over Agorapulse (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (34 vs 33). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Grammarly is slightly ahead of Agorapulse. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Grammarly is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Grammarly is slightly ahead of Agorapulse. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Agorapulse is slightly ahead of Grammarly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Agorapulse is slightly ahead of Grammarly.

Agorapulse carries 307 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Grammarly shows 4,356 stars across 23 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Grammarly's footprint is roughly 14.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Agorapulse is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Grammarly looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.