Agorapulse vs Iterable

Agorapulse and Iterable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Iterable (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Agorapulse (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 32). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Iterable is ahead of Agorapulse. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Iterable is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Iterable is ahead of Agorapulse. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Agorapulse is clearly ahead of Iterable. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Iterable is clearly ahead of Agorapulse.

Agorapulse carries 308 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Iterable shows 269 stars across 100 public repos, 16 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors.

Agorapulse is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Iterable looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.