Agorapulse vs draw.io

Agorapulse and draw.io (draw.io specialises in browser-based diagramming components and applications.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

draw.io (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Agorapulse (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 32). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Agorapulse is slightly ahead of draw.io. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), draw.io is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), draw.io is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), draw.io is slightly ahead of Agorapulse. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), draw.io is slightly ahead of Agorapulse.

Agorapulse carries 308 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. draw.io shows 86,983 stars across 32 public repos, 12 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but draw.io's footprint is roughly 282.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Agorapulse is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. draw.io looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.