Agorapulse vs LinkedIn

Agorapulse and LinkedIn both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

LinkedIn (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Agorapulse (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 32). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), LinkedIn is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), LinkedIn is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), LinkedIn is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LinkedIn is ahead of Agorapulse. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), LinkedIn is slightly ahead of Agorapulse.

Agorapulse carries 308 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. LinkedIn shows 77,785 stars across 137 public repos, 28 active in the last 90 days and 52 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but LinkedIn's footprint is roughly 252.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Agorapulse is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. LinkedIn looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.