Agorapulse vs Miro
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Agorapulse and Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Miro (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Agorapulse (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 32). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is ahead of Agorapulse. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Miro is slightly ahead of Agorapulse. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Agorapulse is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Agorapulse is clearly ahead of Miro.
Agorapulse carries 308 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Miro shows 843 stars across 45 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
Agorapulse is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Miro looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Agorapulse | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 38 |
| Code | 40 | 58 |
| Education | 25 | 86 |
| Community | 25 | 32 |
| Reach | 44 | 0 |
| Momentum | 30 | 8 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 308 | 843 |
| Forks | 154 | 380 |
| Public repos | 80 | 45 |
| Active repos (90d) | 16 | 4 |
| External contributors | 2 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 38 | 65 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 32 |