Agorapulse vs Pendo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Agorapulse and Pendo both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Pendo (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Agorapulse (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 33). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Agorapulse is ahead of Pendo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Pendo is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Pendo is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Agorapulse is clearly ahead of Pendo.
Agorapulse carries 307 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Pendo shows 266 stars across 133 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
Agorapulse is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Pendo looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Agorapulse | Pendo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 38 |
| Code | 40 | 27 |
| Education | 25 | 61 |
| Community | 25 | 47 |
| Reach | 44 | 23 |
| Momentum | 31 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 307 | 266 |
| Forks | 154 | 88 |
| Public repos | 80 | 133 |
| Active repos (90d) | 17 | 18 |
| External contributors | 2 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 38 | 34 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 18 |