Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Agorapulse vs Qonto

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Agorapulse and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Qonto (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Agorapulse (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 32). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is ahead of Agorapulse. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Agorapulse is ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Agorapulse is ahead of Qonto.

Agorapulse carries 308 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Agorapulse is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Qonto looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricAgorapulseQonto
Ranking
Overall rank#662#338
Pillars
Overall3243
Code4057
Education2575
Community2525
Reach4424
Momentum3021
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars308501
Forks154158
Public repos8075
Active repos (90d)1611
External contributors25
Avg polish3862
Avg AI-readiness3336

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Agorapulse developer profileView Qonto developer profile