Agorapulse vs Starling Bank
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Agorapulse and Starling Bank both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Agorapulse and Starling Bank sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (33), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Starling Bank is ahead of Agorapulse. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Agorapulse is ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is ahead of Agorapulse. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is ahead of Agorapulse.
Agorapulse carries 307 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Starling Bank shows 195 stars across 3 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Agorapulse is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Starling Bank looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Agorapulse | Starling Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 33 |
| Code | 40 | 50 |
| Education | 25 | 55 |
| Community | 25 | 9 |
| Reach | 44 | 63 |
| Momentum | 31 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 307 | 195 |
| Forks | 154 | 29 |
| Public repos | 80 | 3 |
| Active repos (90d) | 17 | 3 |
| External contributors | 2 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 38 | 58 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 14 |