Agorapulse vs The Washington Post

Agorapulse and The Washington Post both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

The Washington Post (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Agorapulse (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 32). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), The Washington Post is ahead of Agorapulse. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), The Washington Post is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Agorapulse is slightly ahead of The Washington Post. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), The Washington Post is slightly ahead of Agorapulse. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Agorapulse is ahead of The Washington Post.

Agorapulse carries 308 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. The Washington Post shows 2,751 stars across 91 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but The Washington Post's footprint is roughly 8.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Agorapulse is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. The Washington Post looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.