Agorapulse vs Workable

Agorapulse and Workable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Workable (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Agorapulse (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 32). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Workable is ahead of Agorapulse. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Workable is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Agorapulse is slightly ahead of Workable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Agorapulse is slightly ahead of Workable.

Agorapulse carries 308 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Workable shows 785 stars across 96 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Agorapulse is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Workable looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.