Agorapulse vs Zammad

Agorapulse and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zammad (rank #152) holds a modest lead over Agorapulse (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 32). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zammad is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of Agorapulse. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Agorapulse is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zammad is ahead of Agorapulse.

Agorapulse carries 308 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 16 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zammad's footprint is roughly 20.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Agorapulse is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.