BTW we use OCaml
Ahrefs vs Amplitude
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Amplitude both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Amplitude (rank #93) holds a modest lead over Ahrefs (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 41). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Amplitude is clearly ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Ahrefs is ahead of Amplitude. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Amplitude is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Amplitude is slightly ahead of Ahrefs.
Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Amplitude shows 3,167 stars across 151 public repos, 39 active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors.
Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Amplitude looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ahrefs | Amplitude |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #93 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 56 |
| Code | 42 | 70 |
| Education | 57 | 42 |
| Community | 37 | 42 |
| Reach | 21 | 21 |
| Momentum | 65 | 72 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,303 | 3,167 |
| Forks | 261 | 1,052 |
| Public repos | 171 | 151 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 39 |
| External contributors | 7 | 23 |
| Avg polish | 40 | 70 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 44 |