BTW we use OCaml
Ahrefs vs Appcues
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Appcues both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Appcues (rank #257) holds a narrow lead over Ahrefs (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 41). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Appcues is clearly ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Appcues is ahead of Ahrefs. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of Appcues. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of Appcues. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of Appcues.
Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Appcues shows 984 stars across 122 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Appcues looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ahrefs | Appcues |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #257 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 47 |
| Code | 42 | 63 |
| Education | 57 | 70 |
| Community | 37 | 29 |
| Reach | 21 | 18 |
| Momentum | 65 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,303 | 984 |
| Forks | 261 | 141 |
| Public repos | 171 | 122 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 17 |
| External contributors | 7 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 40 | 59 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 44 |