BTW we use OCaml
Ahrefs vs Blackbird
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Blackbird both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Ahrefs (rank #401) holds a modest lead over Blackbird (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 30). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Ahrefs is ahead of Blackbird. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Blackbird is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of Blackbird. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Blackbird is ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is ahead of Blackbird.
Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Blackbird shows 16 stars across 165 public repos, 77 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Ahrefs's footprint is roughly 81.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Blackbird looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ahrefs | Blackbird |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #728 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 30 |
| Code | 42 | 28 |
| Education | 57 | 63 |
| Community | 37 | 31 |
| Reach | 21 | 30 |
| Momentum | 65 | 53 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,303 | 16 |
| Forks | 261 | 22 |
| Public repos | 171 | 165 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 77 |
| External contributors | 7 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 40 | 31 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 21 |