BTW we use OCaml
Ahrefs vs BigCommerce
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and BigCommerce both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
BigCommerce (rank #103) holds a modest lead over Ahrefs (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (55 vs 41). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), BigCommerce is clearly ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), BigCommerce is ahead of Ahrefs. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), BigCommerce is ahead of Ahrefs. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), BigCommerce is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of BigCommerce.
Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. BigCommerce shows 3,505 stars across 281 public repos, 25 active in the last 90 days and 51 external contributors.
Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. BigCommerce looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ahrefs | BigCommerce |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #103 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 55 |
| Code | 42 | 73 |
| Education | 57 | 69 |
| Community | 37 | 48 |
| Reach | 21 | 26 |
| Momentum | 65 | 64 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,303 | 3,505 |
| Forks | 261 | 3,972 |
| Public repos | 171 | 281 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 25 |
| External contributors | 7 | 51 |
| Avg polish | 40 | 73 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 42 |