Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Ahrefs vs Brightspace

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Brightspace (The official public code repository of Brightspace and D2L Corporation.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Ahrefs (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Brightspace (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 35). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Brightspace is ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Brightspace is ahead of Ahrefs. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of Brightspace. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Ahrefs is ahead of Brightspace. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Brightspace is ahead of Ahrefs.

Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Brightspace shows 436 stars across 144 public repos, 64 active in the last 90 days and 8 external contributors.

Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Brightspace looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricAhrefsBrightspace
Ranking
Overall rank#401#569
Pillars
Overall4135
Code4253
Education5775
Community3730
Reach217
Momentum6578
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars1,303436
Forks261373
Public repos171144
Active repos (90d)2864
External contributors78
Avg polish4054
Avg AI-readiness3526

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Ahrefs developer profileView Brightspace developer profile